IP address 104.194.135.149
Last confirmed 2026-09-15, first seen 2026-09-07. On AS14956. Its certificate is shared with 2 other confirmed hosts.
The upstream re-labelled one or more episodes below in place; only the most recent earlier label is kept, and the archive does not record when the change happened.
104.194.135.149:56001 · Quasar
Last confirmed (today)
The certificate names above are what the certificate ASSERTS, not proof this host owns them — a self-signed certificate can claim any subject, so treat a familiar name here as an impersonation attempt rather than an identity.
Observation history
Observed on 9 of the 18 days since this archive began recording, 2026-08-29 UTC. Presence is per UTC day: a day is marked when the scanner confirmed this address at least once, not once per scan.
Shared TLS certificate · 2 hosts
These hosts served the same certificate. That is the strongest link this corpus can draw between two addresses, though it evidences a shared BUILD rather than a shared operator: a leaked or resold profile puts the same certificate in different hands. Full cohort →
Shared JA4X issuance template · 143 hosts
These hosts issued certificates from the same template — the same distinguished-name fields hashed in the same order. It links tooling, not necessarily an operator. Full cohort →
Showing 24 of 143. Full cohort →
Neighbourhood · 104.194.135.0/24 · 2 hosts
2 other confirmed hosts in the same /24. Adjacent addresses under one operator are a different signal from a shared certificate — they suggest a block, not a build.
Pivots & lookups
Listed in error?
This page is generated from automated scanning and is publicly available. If you are responsible for this address and it should not be listed, write to support@publicmosaic.com — see abuse & takedown for what we need and what happens next, or opt-out to exclude a whole range from scanning.
Addresses are frequently compromised third-party hosts rather than infrastructure their owner stood up. A listing records what a scan observed at a point in time; it is not an allegation about whoever pays for the address.